Post by account_disabled on Feb 24, 2024 22:46:43 GMT -6
The Social Platform for Progress of Madrid (PSPM) joins the call for demonstration on the 23rd at 6:00 p.m. from Atocha to Jacinto Benavente. INFLATION has obvious external causes since the end of the pandemic. Governments (in our case the EU) can act with monetary policy, but many materials have world prices. In these crises there are sectors that benefit and we are referring fundamentally to all those who had goods purchased cheaply and take the opportunity to sell them at a high price, or to the intermediaries who take advantage of the excuse of some increase in their purchases to add some more. The animators of discontent who launch their campaigns aimed rather at destabilization do not talk about that. Diesel is more expensive in France or Germany (due to higher taxes) and there is no indefinite strike. It is true that if transportation or fishing have become more expensive, that cannot harm those who work with it, we have to pay for it together. But does public health or education have to pay for it? It will have to be reflected in order.
It is curious that those who defend that the market regulates everything and who cry out against the "interference" of governments in it, are the first to demand aid when things go badly for them. Because even if their taxes are removed, fuel prices can continue to rise, and then? The right has no other policy than to lower taxes because they do not want public services (it is true that they always Chinese Thailand Phone Number List find an opportunity to increase military spending). This is what they are asking for now because it is the way to blame the Government. Circumstantially, indirect tax reductions are necessary, but this reduction in public income should be all the more reason for the government to implement the tax increases recommended by the expert report. In Personal Income Tax, Companies, Assets and other progressives as dictated by our Constitution. In times like these of recurring crises, all sectors demand help. Against whom are the strikes carried out? Against those who harm you. Those who work “at a loss” will then be against those who do not pay them, against those who have to mobilize: The platforms that monopolize orders or the energy companies, or the large stores that push prices down.
This is where the Government must show that it is on the side of those people who are having a hard time. Some prefer to shout “government resign” as they did in the middle of the pandemic. Others call themselves self-employed and have three or five trucks, (which by the way will not have worked at a loss) because they exploit their drivers. What most people know is, rightly, that their shoe is tight…. like employees. But it cannot be that at the first opportunity we forget what we are playing for. The fossil fuel crisis will have some declines, but its objective scarcity and its serious impact on climate change should get us used to saving them. We already knew that the ecological crisis is going to mean essential sacrifices . But the key is who will have the most impact . That is the responsibility of the government that prides itself on “leaving no one behind.” Negotiating and bravely facing the great interests that (those) are making money. Even proposing public sector participation that, in times of crisis like this, society will understand.
It is curious that those who defend that the market regulates everything and who cry out against the "interference" of governments in it, are the first to demand aid when things go badly for them. Because even if their taxes are removed, fuel prices can continue to rise, and then? The right has no other policy than to lower taxes because they do not want public services (it is true that they always Chinese Thailand Phone Number List find an opportunity to increase military spending). This is what they are asking for now because it is the way to blame the Government. Circumstantially, indirect tax reductions are necessary, but this reduction in public income should be all the more reason for the government to implement the tax increases recommended by the expert report. In Personal Income Tax, Companies, Assets and other progressives as dictated by our Constitution. In times like these of recurring crises, all sectors demand help. Against whom are the strikes carried out? Against those who harm you. Those who work “at a loss” will then be against those who do not pay them, against those who have to mobilize: The platforms that monopolize orders or the energy companies, or the large stores that push prices down.
This is where the Government must show that it is on the side of those people who are having a hard time. Some prefer to shout “government resign” as they did in the middle of the pandemic. Others call themselves self-employed and have three or five trucks, (which by the way will not have worked at a loss) because they exploit their drivers. What most people know is, rightly, that their shoe is tight…. like employees. But it cannot be that at the first opportunity we forget what we are playing for. The fossil fuel crisis will have some declines, but its objective scarcity and its serious impact on climate change should get us used to saving them. We already knew that the ecological crisis is going to mean essential sacrifices . But the key is who will have the most impact . That is the responsibility of the government that prides itself on “leaving no one behind.” Negotiating and bravely facing the great interests that (those) are making money. Even proposing public sector participation that, in times of crisis like this, society will understand.